One of the things I really regret about letting a decade
pass without doing any significant family research is that I’ve really
forgotten some of the fine details that had lodged themselves into my brain.
Today, in July 2012, I pretty much have to look up each name and be reminded of
which branch the person descends through, who their parents and children are,
etc.
With that passing of time I also can’t really remember why I had
got it into my head that Manuel Banegas might actually be the biological father
of Ysabel. In my last post I tried to explain why I resisted the idea of
adoption, however I didn’t really delve much into my theory that Manuel was in
fact the biological father of Ysabel. I can’t remember when that idea popped
into my head or why. Back in the early 2000’s I was doing a lot of research at
the local family history library and viewing microfilms weekly. Had I seen
something, or deduced something that led me to this supposition? Had a relative
said something along the way that led me to develop my theory? Or was it just
as I mentioned in the last blog post, wishful thinking?
In any case, it was a thought that used to tease me … “What
if Manuel really was Ysabel’s father?
What if he had never married Ysabel’s mother but somehow ended up taking
and raising the child? (The mother may have died or left him or
who-knows-what.) What if his new bride, Ynes had a hard time accepting that he
had been with another woman before her (whether they had been married or not?)
and therefore Ysabel was always treated differently than the natural sons?
There’s an odd but common occurence that is known to hinder
family research and that is the skeletons in the closet. They often are hidden
because of some embarrassment or shame and they are really, really difficult to
root out. I’ve run into them on more than one occasion in researching my
hubby’s family roots (he even has a relative who is buried under a false name
due to the shame attached to her death by suicide).
What if that is what happened with regard to Manuel and
Ysabel?
And why I’m still haranguing away at this here and now? Well, only
because of this: last night while doing some more online research I tried some new searches
using the clues I mentioned in my last blog post. Just when it seemed like I really wasn't getting anywhere and was about to throw in the towel, I found a
baptismal record that I found very intriguing. Keep in mind that these are
indexed from original records and I haven’t seen the original document yet,
however the names and dates are lining up (view the record online here):
"Mexico, Baptisms, 1560-1950," Jose Ysabel Banegas
Espalino, 1844
Name: Jose Ysabel Banegas
Espalino
Gender: Male
Baptism/Christening Date: 13
Jul 1844
Baptism/Christening Place: NUESTRA
SENORA DE GUADALUPE,JUAREZ,CHIHUAHUA,MEXICO
Birth Date:
Birthplace:
Death Date:
Name Note:
Race:
Father's Name: Manuel
Banegas
Father's Birthplace:
Father's Age:
Mother's Name: Casilda
Espalino
Mother's Birthplace:
This little discovery has me reeling. Is this proof that
Manuel actually was Ysabel’s biological father? What do you think?
1 comment:
Cindy, your theory about Ysabel being Manuel's biological son could very well be true. One fact could be that Ysabel did take his mother's maiden name Espalin or Espalino. The babtismal document does mention his mother's name and his dad, Manuel.
Post a Comment